【ADB】Exploring the Different Financing Models for Digital Public Infrastructure and Why They Matter
免费
David Eaves, Associate Professor in Digital Government, UCL Institute for Innovation
and Public Purpose
Mansi Kedia, Senior Fellow, Indian Council for Research on International Economic
Relations
Exploring the Different
Financing Models for
Digital Public Infrastructure
and Why They Matter
brief
policy
Key Points
• Despiteincreasinginstances
ofdigitalpublicinfrastructure
(DPI)deployment,thereislittle
publicinformationonhow
differentDPIsarefinancedand
practicallynopubliclyavailable
estimatesonhowmuchitcosts
toimplementaDPI.
• FinancingofDPIsisa
complexissueinvolving
decision-makingonpublic
policyobjectives,operations,
stakeholdermanagement,and
governance.
• FinancingofDPIscanbe
understoodusingthestrategic
triangleframeworkthat
weavestogetherthreekey
elementsofanypolicypriority:
(i)publicvalue,(ii)operational
feasibility,and(iii)supportor
politicalfeasibility.
• Policydiscussionsonfinancing
ofDPIsshouldincludeboth
capitalandoperationalcosts
ofaDPI.
• TheG20shouldbuildknow-
howonfinancingmodelsfor
DPIs,includingfinancingDPIs
forlow-incomecountries,and
encouragetheacceptanceof
differentfinancingchoices
adoptedbycountries.
No. 2024-6 (April)
© 2024 Asian Development
Bank Institute
ISSN 2411-6734
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56506/
VYDL5566
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-
NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
International License.
1. Introduction
Digitalpublicinfrastructure(DPI) isa new conceptualmodelfor services—such as
identity,monetarytransactions,credentialmanagement,anddataexchange—that
are essential to participating in society and markets in the digital era.1 With the
rightgovernanceandfinancing,DPIscanimprove“knowyourcustomer”provisions,
facilitatingaccesstoprivateandpublicservices,andimproveaccesstobankingand
financial services. During the COVID-19 pandemic, countries with DPIs were able
to deposit money directly into the bank accounts of target populations quickly,
efficiently,andwithreducedriskofleakage.2Thereissignificantandgrowinginterest
bycountriesaroundtheworldinDPI.Howitscomponentsareadoptedandfinanced
carriesbothrisksandopportunities.
DPIs have two key conceptual elements. As infrastructure, they cut through the
siloedapproachofdesigningandimplementingdigitalsolutionswithinteroperable,
society-scale programs that shift innovation and competition to activities that
take place atop it. For example, a single electrical grid, by standardizing voltage
and amperage, eliminates competition around the delivery of power but creates
vast competitive markets around items (like appliances) that use power. As public
infrastructure, DPIs prioritize access and inclusion over profits, similar to how
electricityandwaterareprovisionedinmuchoftheworld.
Because DPIs are a combination of software, standards, and policy, they can be
replicatedandadoptedbycountriesmorequicklythantheirphysicalinfrastructure
counterparts. For example, the Modular Open-Source Identity Platform, a digital
public good3 born out of Aadhaar, India’s homegrown digital identity programme
1 Eaves, D., and J. Sandman. 2023. What Is Digital Public Infrastructure? UCL IIPP Blog. April. https://
medium.com/iipp-blog/what-is-digital-public-infrastructure-6fbfa74f2f8c(accessed10April2023).
2 India’sWorldClass DigitalInfraWorth EmulatingbyManyNations.Outlook. April 2023.https://www.
outlookindia.com/business/india-s-world-class-digital-infra-worth-emulating-by-many-nations-imf-
paper-news-276531(accessed6Jun2023).
3 Digital Public Goods Alliance (DPGA) Registry. https://digitalpublicgoods.net/registry/modular-open-
source-identity-platform.html(accessed23May,2023).
ADBI Policy Brief No. 2024-6 (April) 2
(oneoftheworld’sleadingDPIs),isbeingimplemented
inseveralothercountries,includingSriLanka,Ethiopia,
Morocco,thePhilippines,Guinea,andTogo.4
Giventherapidspreadofthisnewtypeofinfrastructure,
how DPIs are financed is quickly becoming a complex
issue that encompasses questions of objectives,
operations,stakeholdermanagement, andgovernance.
Importantly,financingdoesnotrelateonlytotheinitial
capital,butrecurringcosts relatedto maintenanceand
upgradingthesystem.Thelifetimeinvestmentismuch
morecriticalthanthefundingrequiredforsettingupa
DPI,madereadilyavailablebygovernments,multilateral
organizations, and philanthropic institutions. Indeed,
while there are important lessons that can be drawn
fromphysicalinfrastructureprojects,theremayalsobe
limits.Softwaredoesnotalwaysadheretotheprinciple
ofhighupfrontcapitalcostand(relatively)lowongoing
operational expenses. Quite the opposite, ensuring
ongoing interoperability, addressing cyber threats,
andmanagingincreased adoptionand scalecancause
operationalcoststoexceedcapitalcosts.
2. A Framework for Financing DPIs
Financing DPIs can be explored through a conceptual
framework based on the strategic triangle proposed
byscholarMark Mooreforpolicydesign andanalysis.5
The framework suggests three key components for
any successful policy: (i) public value; (ii) operational
feasibility including financial, legal, technical, and
managerial; and (iii) support or political feasibility.
Therefore,financingasacorecomponentofoperational
feasibilitycannotbeseparatedfrompublicvalueorthe
primary objective of a DPI. Importantly, even similar
DPIs need not necessarily be conceived for the same
objectivesorpublicvalue.Forinstance,twocomparable
digitalpaymentDPIs,India’sUnifiedPaymentInterface
(UPI)and Brazil’sPix,wereconceptualizedfordifferent
primary objectives. For UPI, it was to accelerate the
adoptionofdigitalpaymentsandaddresstheproblem
of financial exclusion; while for Pix, it was to catalyze
marketcompetitionandinnovationindigitalpayments.
Operationally, UPI is funded and supported by a
consortiumofbanks,whilePixisfundedandsupported
byBancoCentraldoBrasil(Brazil’scentralbank).While
UPI is currently free of cost for all categories of users,
Pixchargesatransactionfeeformerchanttransactions.
These are two distinct financing models that align
with specific stated goals—one led by an industry
consortiumthatenablesprivate-sectorparticipationto
improvefinancialinclusionandtheothermandatedby
the government to enhance market participation and
competitionusingatransactionfeemodel(Figure1).
Thereisathirdmodeloffinancingthatisgovernment-
ledfortheinitialcapitalaswellasthroughthelifecycle
of the DPI. For example, Aadhaar has been entirely
funded by the government since its launch in 2009.
4Sanzgiri, V. 2022. Six Countries Take Up IIIT-B’s Aadhaar-Like Digital Identity Programme. Medianama. July. https://www.medianama.
com/2022/07/223-six-countries-take-up-iiit-bs-aadhaar-like-digital-identity-programme/(accessed10April2023).
5 Moore,M.H.2013.PublicValuePropositionsandtheStrategicTriangle.HarvardUniversity.https://scholar.harvard.edu/markmoore/publications/
public-value-propositions-and-strategic-triangle(accessed23May2023).
Figure 1: Strategic Alignment for Digital Payment DPIs
Source: Authors, Adapted from Moore (2013).
Support:
Government
patronization and
regulated entities
UPI
(India)
Public Value:
Digital payments
and financial
inclusion
Operational
Feasibility:
Industry consortia
Pix
(Brazil)
Public Value:
Driving
competition and
innovation in
digital payments
Operational
Feasibility:
Government-led
private sector
participation
Support:
Government
mandated
stakeholder
participation
摘要:
展开>>
收起<<
DavidEaves,AssociateProfessorinDigitalGovernment,UCLInstituteforInnovationandPublicPurposeMansiKedia,SeniorFellow,IndianCouncilforResearchonInternationalEconomicRelationsExploringtheDifferentFinancingModelsforDigitalPublicInfrastructureandWhyTheyMatterbriefpolicyKeyPoints•Despiteincreasinginstanceso...
相关推荐
-
免费2024-03-19 190
-
免费2024-04-15 209
-
免费2024-04-21 999+
-
免费2024-04-21 172
-
免费2024-04-21 242
-
免费2024-06-03 175
-
免费2024-07-08 157
-
VIP专享2024-09-18 256
-
VIP专享2024-10-06 164
-
VIP专享2024-10-09 181
作者:林sir
分类:电子书
价格:免费
属性:6 页
大小:217.52KB
格式:PDF
时间:2024-05-21