Morgan Stanley Fixed-Global Macro Strategist Did Sahm-one Say Recession-109894318

VIP专享
3.0 复利王子 2024-08-29 26 2.53MB 87 页 免费
侵权投诉
M

Global Macro Strategist
Did 'Sahm'-one Say Recession?

Matthew Hornbach

 !"  #$%$%&'$($)*&
Andrew M Watrous

+,-. !"  #$%$%&'$(/%)&
Martin W Tobias, CFA

0 !"  #$%$%&'$('1&'
Francesco Grechi

23 !"  #$%$%&'$($114
Zoe K Strauss

5. !"  #$%$%&'$(161&
789:#
James K Lord

; , !"  #66%1&'&&(*%/6
David S. Adams, CFA

<=,+,  !"  #66%1&6%/(*/$)
Wanting Low

- !"  #66%1&6%/(')6$
Lorenzo Testa

>0 !"  #66%1&'&&(1**&
Fabio Bassanin, CFA

2? !"  #66%1&6%/($)'4
Dominic J Krummenacher

< @.  !"  #66%1&6%/(4&)$
A23:B88CDE#
Koichi Sugisaki

@.F !" .G  #)$*')*'()6%)
Hiromu Uezato
H+
 .A> !" .G  #)$*')*'()6*$

Eli P Carter

I! !"  #$%$%&'$(6&1*
US economic data over the past two weeks calmed nerves
about a possible recession initially brought about by a
triggering of the Sahm Rule and a partial unwind of yen carry
trades. Defensive positioning offended instead of pleased, but
we stay in UST curve steepeners into supply/Jackson Hole.

We discuss the Sahm Rule, a new recession warning indicator from Michaillat
and Saez (2024), and our economists preference for an indicator created
from the employment-to-population ratio. We combine all three in a
"Triumvirate Rule", which implies a 22% probability that a US recession began
already. This compares to the 16% probability professional forecasters
assigned to negative real GDP growth in 3Q24 and a 0% probability from the
employment-to-population indicator.

In the US, we maintain UST 2s20s steepeners and maintain Sep/Nov FOMC
OIS flatteners. In the euro area, we enter RXV4 132.5/131.5 put spread and
maintain EUR 2s5s flatteners (vs. ESTR), ECB Sep/Oct OIS steepeners,
ERZ5ERZ6 flatteners, and long ERZ4 96.625/96.875/97.125 call fly. We close
the 10y BTP/Bund widener. In the UK, we stay long SFIZ4 95.40-55-70 call
fly, and keep 10s30s gilt flattener and short 15y ASW. In Japan, we maintain
long 20y JGB vs pay 2y OIS, and JGB 5s10s ASW box flattener.
 
In light of recent events, we look at what has happened historically in G10
FX when the VIX spikes. We argue markets will price additional RBNZ cuts.
We provide an overview of different metrics that are indicative of the trend
and size of the JPY carry trade. We close short CAD/JPY position as investors
have increasingly priced in US soft landing scenario.
!"#$%&%
In the US, we compare 5-year breakevens intraday moves with monthly
surprises in CPI. We analyze historical trends in rent inflation.
 "'
We discuss factors that keep us neutral on repo conditions. We examine
MMF portfolio holdings in July and find MMFs accessing the RRP became
increasingly concentrated.
'((
We maintain our vol surface steepener amid stretched valuations and a
(potentially) quiet week ahead.
The next Global Macro Strategist will publish on September 6, 2024.
Morgan Stanley does and seeks to do business with
companies covered in Morgan Stanley Research. As a result,
investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of
interest that could affect the objectivity of Morgan Stanley
Research. Investors should consider Morgan Stanley
Research as only a single factor in making their investment
decision.
For analyst certification and other important disclosures,
refer to the Disclosure Section, located at the end of this
report.
+= Analysts employed by non-U.S. affiliates are not registered
with FINRA, may not be associated persons of the member
and may not be subject to FINRA restrictions on
communications with a subject company, public appearances
and trading securities held by a research analyst account.
August 16, 2024 11:16 PM GMT
M

2
Global Macro Strategy
JH3+K0+KILJMatthew Hornbach
 #$%$%&'$($)*&
Did Someone Say 'Sahm'-thing About a Recession?
What probability do we put on a US recession? We get asked this question often, but it's a
question better directed to our economists. It's also a question that requires specificity.
What is the probability we enter recession again at any point in the future? What is the
probability we will enter a recession in the next year? What is the probability the
recession has already begun?
The Philadelphia Fed surveys professional forecasters every quarter about the probability
they assign to negative real GDP growth in the quarter of the survey, the following
quarter (the “Anxious Index”), and the few quarters thereafter.
For the 3Q24 survey published August 9, professional forecasters including our Chief
Global Economist Seth Carpenter assigned a 21% probability, on average, to real GDP
contracting in 4Q24 (see Exhibit 1 ). They assigned a 25% probability, on average, to real
GDP contracting in 4Q25 (see Exhibit 2 ).
Exhibit 1: M!!"2,.="GMG!
2NM2OP+Q.7,Q
21
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
'68 '72 '76 '80 '84 '88 '92 '96 '00 '04 '08 '12 '16 '20 '24
NBER recession Anxious Index
%
.P!"HD2H?M!,!RDK?IHD?! 
Exhibit 2: M!!"2,M2PM!"!3<M
,!6S.
25
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
'68 '72 '76 '80 '84 '88 '92 '96 '00 '04 '08 '12 '16 '20 '24
NBER recession +4-quarters
%
.P!"HD2H?M!,!RDK?IHD?! 
Forecasting involves art and science, and remains as difficult an endeavor as ever.
Forecasting recessions, given the infrequency, seems to be one of the most difficult
aspects of the profession. Data from the Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) make
that clear.
In the quarter before NBER recessions, professional forecasters almost always
assigned "usual" probabilities that a recession will begin in the following quarter,
where we define "usual" as within 1 standard deviation of the non-NBER recession
average assigned probability (see Exhibit 3 ).
M

 !" 3
In the quarter an NBER recession begins, professional forecasters placed higher-
than-usual probabilities that the recession will begin that quarter, but still "low"
probabilities on an absolute basis, where we define "low" as around a 1-in-3 chance
or lower (see Exhibit 4 ).
Exhibit 3: +Q.7,QS.GK?IH
,(=
24
12
70
20 18
11
17
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
3Q69 3Q73 4Q79 2Q81 2Q90 4Q00 3Q07
Anxious Index in quarter before NBER recession begins
%
Non-recession average
and +/- 1 stdev
.P!"HD2H?M!,!RDK?IHD?! 
Exhibit 4: M!"!3<M=
S.,(=
%
.P!"HD2H?M!,!RDK?IHD?! 
Investors, recognizing the challenge forecasters face in assessing the probability of a
recession, turn to other approaches. The yield curve remains a popular indicator, but has
fallen short – so far – in the current cycle. Investors also look to the Sahm Rule, which
compares the 3-month average unemployment rate to the minimum of that 3-month
average over the past 12 months.
The Sahm Rule indicator reached its publicized recession threshold of 0.5pp in July. But
our economists think the Sahm Rule misleads more than it informs in this cycle, given the
recent increase in the labor force. Another "rule" making the rounds comes from Michaillat
and Saez (2024), which also reached – and then surpassed – its recession threshold of 0.3
(see Exhibit 5 and Exhibit 6 ).
Exhibit 5: !!,>N%1%6O
,,K?IHP$4/%R
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
'52 '58 '64 '70 '76 '82 '88 '94 '00 '06 '12 '18 '24
NBER recession Michaillat-Saez (2024)
Percentage points
Perc
.P!"HD!!,>N%1%6OD?! 
Exhibit 6: !!,>N%1%6O
,,K?IHPR%,,
0.5
0.3
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
'04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14 '16 '18 '20 '22 '24
NBER recession Michaillat-Saez (2024)
.P!"HD!!,>N%1%6OD?! 
摘要:

MGlobalMacroStrategistDid'Sahm'-oneSayRecession?MatthewHornbach!"#$%$%&'$($)*&AndrewMWatrous...

展开>> 收起<<
Morgan Stanley Fixed-Global Macro Strategist Did Sahm-one Say Recession-109894318.pdf

共87页,预览10页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

作者:复利王子 分类:外资研报 价格:免费 属性:87 页 大小:2.53MB 格式:PDF 时间:2024-08-29

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 87
客服
关注